Make your research impossible to overlook.
Enter your email. Your first report is ready in four minutes.
No credit card. No password.
Your research is good.
It's invisible.
A grant panel convenes. The reviewers are vaguely familiar with the established names in your field. Yours isn't one of them. You don't get funded.
It's not your talent.
It's eyeballs on your talent.
AI is making it worse.
Enter your email.
Your first report is ready in four minutes.
No credit card. No password.
Strategic scholarly presence, delivered on a schedule.
Loud Camel is an intelligence brief that tells you exactly who to reach, why, where your work should be visible, and what to say.
A scheduled summary arrives by email; a full brief in your private workspace.
You act.
Nothing happens without you.
New relevant scholars
People whose recent work connects to yours, with a clear explanation of why they're relevant now — not just 'same field' but 'published on this specific topic three weeks ago, relevant to your 2023 paper.'
Reconnection opportunities
Dormant contacts worth re-engaging, surfaced because something changed: a new publication, a role shift, a conference coming up. Timed reasons to reach out.
Visibility actions
Specific places where a comment, a post, or an accessible summary of your research would make it findable — for AI search engines and for researchers browsing active discussions.
Ready-to-use drafts
Outreach emails, Reddit comments, LinkedIn posts, blog excerpts — each grounded in your actual research, written to your tone preferences. You review, edit, and send — or don't.
Measured effect of targeted article promotion in a randomized controlled trial of 3,200 peer-reviewed articles across 64 journals — sustained at 36 months.
Kudlow, Brown & Eysenbach · Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2021
Across abstracts in Nature, Science, and PNAS, papers using promotional language received significantly more citations, more views, and more media attention.
Stavrova, Kleinberg, Evans & Ivanović · Communications Psychology, 2025
Denser indirect international collaboration ties — through domestic collaborators with global connections — predicted significantly greater research productivity and prominence.
Chen, Ding, Zhao, Guo & Ning · Research Policy, 2025
Enter your email.
Your first report is ready in four minutes.
No credit card. No password.
From your publication list to your first brief — in a morning.
You share your research
Provide a publication list and a short brief: your preferred tone, and what you care about most — citations, grant visibility, collaborations, or work opportunities.
We scan and interpret
The system monitors your field for new publications, active discussions, and people relevant to your work. It identifies who matters and why, then prepares content and drafts tailored to your specific research.
You receive the brief
A focused, curated digest arrives on a recurring schedule. You review it, act on what fits, skip what doesn't. No learning curve. No new tools to manage.
No programming. No AI prompting skills required. You provide the research — we deliver the brief.
Enter your email.
Your first report is ready in four minutes.
No credit card. No password.
"This is a tool every academic should have at their side."
Built for three kinds of researchers. You're probably one of them.
The quiet publisher
Assistant professor, senior postdoc, lecturer
Your work is good — the citations and recognition aren't reflecting that yet. You feel the gap between the quality of your research and where you should be. That gap is a visibility problem.
The network-builder
Postdoc, new faculty, advanced PhD
You're operating within your advisor's network, but you need to build your own. Your work may be excellent but it isn't findable outside your immediate circle — and it won't be until you build presence in the places that compound.
The strategic reconnector
Tenured faculty, senior lecturer, late-career
You have a network, but it reflects past collaborations, not current work. The people reviewing your grants may not know what you're doing now. You need strategic reconnection — without spending hours you don't have.
Detailed fit guide by career stage →
Not for you if you want fully automated outreach with no personal review, or if you have no published work yet.
Enter your email.
Your first report is ready in four minutes.
No credit card. No password.
You stay in control. Always.
Academic reputation is not something to gamble with. Loud Camel is designed by a researcher, for researchers.
Built by a researcher who needed this tool and couldn't find it.
Loud Camel was created by Boris Gorelik, PhD — a data scientist with two decades of experience across life sciences, cybersecurity, and social network analysis. At 49, Boris returned to academia and faced a problem he hadn't anticipated: his skills and track record were solid, but his scholarly visibility had eroded. The people who needed to know his work didn't.
Rather than accept the gap, he applied the same tools he'd spent his career building — AI, network analysis, automated research pipelines — to the problem of scholarly presence. The results were immediate: relevant connections surfaced, outreach landed, a collaboration confirmed.
He built Loud Camel because the problem wasn't unique to him. Every researcher faces it. Most don't have the technical background to solve it themselves. Now they don't have to.
Enter your email.
Your first report is ready in four minutes.
No credit card. No password.
Simple pricing. One plan to start.
No credit card required to start. Cancel anytime. 30-day money-back guarantee.
One conference registration costs $500–$1,500. A grant writing consultant runs $150–$300 per hour. Loud Camel works continuously, year-round, at $42 a month.
Starting at $42/month. No credit card required. No automated sending — ever.
Questions? Write to boris@loudcamel.com